Up for the fight

By Jim Taylor, Editor MACS ACtion

What would you do if a government-backed program proposed to implement a tax that would raise your cost for a tank of R-134a by perhaps $16-30 per pound? That’s exactly what may happen in Australia, and MACS’ partner organization VASA is gearing up to take on the national government in a battle of some significance.

VASA’s CEO (and all-around good bloke) Ken Newton explains it all in his column in the next issue of ACTION magazine. It is a situation worth watching because it could herald a shift in how governments deal with high GWP refrigerants. Here’s a brief explanation from Ken’s column:


“VASA and its counterparts in other refrigerant sectors are fighting a rearguard action against the Australian government, which has just announced that it intends to add a carbon price (read tax) based on the global warming potential of each refrigerant imported. This would place an additional per-kilo cost – estimated to be at least $32, and maybe as high as $60 – on R-134a. [kilogram = 2.2 lbs -ed.]
The move, which adds another crazy dimension to an already hugely unpopular government tax, has the potential to leave Australia’s orderly refrigerant stewardship scheme in tatters.

If the tax plan goes ahead, and prime minister Julia Gillard seems hell-bent on pushing it through as part of her sustainable future agenda, the “carbon price” is likely to unravel the award winning Refrigerant Australia recovery and safe destruction program which has been hailed as the best in the world.”

Australia’s cradle-to-grave oversight plan (“scheme”)  arguably is the best in the world for preventing unwanted refrigerant release and managing recovery and destruction of contaminated refrigerant(s). For example, very accurate sales records must be kept by both shops and suppliers, and just about everyone involved with the products must pass an environmental certification—even the parts driver who just transports it from store to shop. Other than some additional paperwork, the plan is not overly burdensome on shops, and both the industry and the government liked the idea when it was adopted a few years ago.

The Australian government seems to think it’s not good enough, and we say “keep an eye on this situation.” Just because it’s not happening in the U.S. doesn’t mean somebody here  won’t notice, and right now carbon reductions or offset programs are big on many agendas.  Read all of Ken’s story in the next issue of ACTION magazine coming in November; it’s a good one.

When having your mobile A/C system professionally serviced, insist on proper repair procedures and quality replacement parts. Insist on recovery and recycling so that refrigerant can be reused and not released into the atmosphere.

If you’re a service professional and not a MACS member yet, you should be, click here for more information.

You can E-mail us at macsworldwide@macsw.org or visit http://bit.ly/cf7az8 to find a Mobile Air Conditioning Society member repair shop in your area. Visit http://bit.ly/9FxwTh to find out more about your car’s mobile A/C and engine cooling system.

The 32nd annual Mobile Air Conditioning Society (MACS) Worldwide Convention and Trade Show will take place January 18-20, 2012 at the Rio All Suite Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, NV.


About macsworldwide

Mobile Air Conditioning Society (MACS) Worldwide Founded in 1981, MACS is the leading non-profit trade association for the mobile air conditioning, heating and engine cooling system segment of the automotive aftermarket. Since 1991, MACS has assisted more than 600,000 technicians to comply with the 1990 U.S. EPA Clean Air Act requirements for certification in refrigerant recovery and recycling to protect the environment. The Mobile Air Conditioning Society (MACS) Worldwide’s mission is clear and focused--as the recognized global authority on mobile air conditioning and heat transfer industry issues. www.macsw.org
This entry was posted in Automotive, Automotive training, Mobile Air Conditioning and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Up for the fight

  1. James Buttery says:

    Sounds pretty ridiculous to me. This would obviously increase the price for the consumer also correct?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s